Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Service View of Engineered Systems"
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Maturity: Good -- one suggested grammar change, below. | Maturity: Good -- one suggested grammar change, below. | ||
− | Opening sentence should be "world economies" (plural); "manufacturing economies" (plural); and "service economies" (plural). | + | Opening sentence should be "world economies" (plural); "manufacturing economies" (plural); and "service economies" (plural). ***Fixed |
I wonder about the validity of "Electronic-Oriented" under "Unique Characteristics of Service Systems". Just a question for the author here -- aren't there service systems without an electronic orientation? Is my local laundromat a service system? Is it electronically oriented? (I recognize that the author is not called upon to assert his own views, but to review the state of knowledge -- I just raise this as a minor question.) | I wonder about the validity of "Electronic-Oriented" under "Unique Characteristics of Service Systems". Just a question for the author here -- aren't there service systems without an electronic orientation? Is my local laundromat a service system? Is it electronically oriented? (I recognize that the author is not called upon to assert his own views, but to review the state of knowledge -- I just raise this as a minor question.) |
Revision as of 01:23, 12 September 2011
Seems to be in good shape for 0.50
Description: Section is descriptive
Balance: OK
Scope: OK
Writing: with one minor suggestion, OK
Citations: OK
References: OK
Cross-Linkages: OK
Maturity: Good -- one suggested grammar change, below.
Opening sentence should be "world economies" (plural); "manufacturing economies" (plural); and "service economies" (plural). ***Fixed
I wonder about the validity of "Electronic-Oriented" under "Unique Characteristics of Service Systems". Just a question for the author here -- aren't there service systems without an electronic orientation? Is my local laundromat a service system? Is it electronically oriented? (I recognize that the author is not called upon to assert his own views, but to review the state of knowledge -- I just raise this as a minor question.)