Talk:Enabling Systems Engineering: Difference between revisions

From SEBoK Draft
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Blanked the page)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Concept Map Diagram==
Hillary S:
This diagram could fit here; if so we might want to redraw it to improve legibility. (It is also in another place in one of the "business and enterprises" topics.)


Alice S.:  Yes, I think the main improvement of this article is to take the wonderful work put into the diagram, and redo the visualization so that the picture is worth a thousand words, right now it's just too busy.  We made need a higher level diagram and then the detailed pieces in separate figures.  And then we connect each of the points under the "Key Concepts and Relationships" seciton to the diagrams which visualize the points.
Cihan D.: As an internal reviewer. I agree with Hillary's and Alice's comments. Thia is the only problem with this knowledge area.
== Longevity of SE organisations ==
Hillary S posting:
Certain types of SE organisation persist through the whole lifecycle of the system (or capability) of interest. For example the industry construct that developed the Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft has established a commercial construct that will persist throughout the in service life of the aircraft, providing support and upgrade services to the operators. This organisation may outlive some or many of the individual businesses involved in the enterprise.
==General Review==
Garry Roedler:
Some additional items to consider:
1. Add links to the glossary for "Service" and "Product" in the second paragraph.
2. The second paragraph states "On the other hand, BEs typically have permanence." The term "permanence" may be a bit overstated, since many enterprises are created as joint ventures for a given product or service and are dissolved after the product or service life.  Suggest changing to "On the other hand, BEs typically have a more enduring existence."
3. Under the Key Concepts, item 2 should include that the BE builds and manages a portfolio of products and services that are expected to provide the value. 
4. The Key Concepts and figure seem to ignore the processes, tools, and technology chosen/defined by the BE as enablers for SE.
5. Are there no references that apply for this level of the discussion?  Consider the Organization Project Enabling Processes in 15288.

Revision as of 21:22, 15 September 2011

Retrieved from "https://sebokwiki.org/draft/w/index.php?title=Talk:Enabling_Systems_Engineering&oldid=21061"