System Safety: Difference between revisions

From SEBoK Draft
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


9.1.2. System safety must be a planned, integrated, comprehensive effort employing both engineering and management resources.
9.1.2. System safety must be a planned, integrated, comprehensive effort employing both engineering and management resources.
Safety personnel are responsible for the integration of system safety requirements, principles, procedures, and processes into the program and into lower system design levels to ensure a safe and effective interface.  Two common mechanisms are the Safety Working Group (SWG) and the Management Safety Review Board (MSRB).  The SWG enables safety personnel from all IPTs to evaluate, coordinate, and implement a safety approach that is integrated at the system level in accordance with MIL-STD-882.  (DoD 2000)  Increasingly, safety reviewes are being recognized as an important risk management tool. The MSRB provides program level oversight and resolves safety related program issues across all integrated product teams (IPT).  
Safety personnel are responsible for the integration of system safety requirements, principles, procedures, and processes into the program and into lower system design levels to ensure a safe and effective interface.  Two common mechanisms are the Safety Working Group (SWG) and the Management Safety Review Board (MSRB).  The SWG enables safety personnel from all IPTs to evaluate, coordinate, and implement a safety approach that is integrated at the system level in accordance with MIL-STD-882.  (DoD 2000)  Increasingly, safety reviewes are being recognized as an important risk management tool. The MSRB provides program level oversight and resolves safety related program issues across all integrated product teams (IPT).  



Revision as of 15:06, 31 August 2011

In the most general sense, safety is freedom from harm. As an engineering discipline, safety is concerned with assuring that life-critical systems remain operational even when other parts of the system fail. MIL-STD-882D defines system safety as “The application of engineering and management principles, criteria, and techniques to achieve acceptable mishap risk, within the constraints of operational effectiveness, time, and cost, throughout all phases of the system life cycle.” (DoD 2000, p. 2) System safety engineering focuses on identifying and eliminating hazards, with the ultimate goal of reducing the occurrence of mishaps by persons qualified in the field (MIL-STD-882D, Draft). A hazard is defined as “Any real or potential condition that can cause injury, illness, or death to personnel; damage to or loss of equipment or property; or damage to the environment.” (DoD 2000, p. 1) However, safety engineering is often performed in reaction to adverse events. For example, many improvements in aircraft safety are a result of recommendations by the National Air Traffic Safety Board based on accident investigations. Mishap risk is defined as: “An expression of the impact and possibility of a mishap in terms of potential mishap severity and probability of occurrence.” (DoD 2000, p. 2) Failure to identify risks to safety, and the according inability to address or "control" these risks, can result in massive costs, both human and economic (Roland and Moriarty 1990).

System Safety specialists are typically responsible for ensuring system safety. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 91-202 (2005) provides the following guidance (USAF 1998):

9.1 System safety disciplines apply engineering and management principles, criteria, and techniques throughout the life cycle of a system within the constraints of operational effectiveness, schedule, and costs

9.1.1. System safety is an inherent element of system design and is essential to supporting system requirements. Successful system safety efforts depend on clearly defined safety objectives and system requirements.

9.1.2. System safety must be a planned, integrated, comprehensive effort employing both engineering and management resources.

Safety personnel are responsible for the integration of system safety requirements, principles, procedures, and processes into the program and into lower system design levels to ensure a safe and effective interface. Two common mechanisms are the Safety Working Group (SWG) and the Management Safety Review Board (MSRB). The SWG enables safety personnel from all IPTs to evaluate, coordinate, and implement a safety approach that is integrated at the system level in accordance with MIL-STD-882. (DoD 2000) Increasingly, safety reviewes are being recognized as an important risk management tool. The MSRB provides program level oversight and resolves safety related program issues across all integrated product teams (IPT).

Table 1 and Figure 1 provide additional information on safety.

Safety Ontology

Table 1. Safety Ontology (Figure Developed for BKCASE)

Ontology Element Name Ontology Element Attributes Relationship to Safety Failure modes Manner of failure Required attribute Severity Consequences of failure Required attribute Criticality Impact of failure Required attribute Hazard identification Identification of potential failure modes Required to determine failure modes Risk Probability of a failure occurring Required attribute Mitigation Measure to take corrective action Necessary to determine criticality and severity

System Safety Process

Figure 1. System Safety Process

References

Please make sure all references are listed alphabetically and are formatted according to the Chicago Manual of Style (15th ed). See the BKCASE Reference Guidance for additional information.

Citations

List all references cited in the article. Note: SEBoK 0.5 uses Chicago Manual of Style (15th ed). See the BKCASE Reference Guidance for additional information.

Primary References

All primary references should be listed in alphabetical order. Remember to identify primary references by creating an internal link using the ‘’’reference title only’’’ (title). Please do not include version numbers in the links.

Additional References

All additional references should be listed in alphabetical order.


Article Discussion

[Go to discussion page]

<- Previous Article | Parent Article | Next Article ->

Signatures

--Bkcase 19:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC) (on behalf of Dick Fairley)